How to Become a Money Smart MD
with guest Dr. Matt Poyner
Most physicians start their careers assuming the financial side will figure itself out. It rarely does, and by the time that becomes obvious, a lot of ground has been lost.
Dr. Matt Poyner trained at McMaster and UBC, spent 13 years in full-time emergency medicine, and then did something unusual: he left medicine to travel the world for a year with his family. When he came back, he dedicated himself to improving financial literacy among physicians. He joins the podcast to talk about what he learned, what physicians most commonly get wrong, and how to figure out whether a DIY investing approach is right for you.
In this episode:
The biggest financial questions physicians know they're confused about and the ones they don't know they're confused about
The three Cs: what it takes to become a successful DIY investor
Why money is a tool, not a goal, and what actually drives life satisfaction
The four Fs of evidence-based happiness
Why perfect is the enemy of good in financial planning
Red flags to watch for when evaluating a financial advisor
What Physicians Are Most Confused About
Dr. Poyner divides physician financial confusion into two categories: things they know they're confused about and things they don't realize they need more clarity on.
The known ones are familiar: how to use a corporation within an overall financial plan, whether to prioritize an RRSP versus TFSA versus corporation, whether to pay off debt or invest, and whether to hire a financial advisor or go the DIY route.
The less obvious category is more about mindset. A lot of physicians are living in what Dr. Poyner calls a constant state of time famine, where being busy has become a badge of honor. The research on this is sobering: living in a state of constant time stress has been shown to be as damaging to mental and physical health as being unemployed. And yet for many physicians it's treated as normal or even desirable.
Understanding how money connects to time, and how financial decisions either trap you or free you, is an underlying theme of everything else in this episode.
The Three Cs of DIY Investing
One of the most useful frameworks in this episode is what Dr. Poyner calls the three Cs for anyone considering a self-directed investing approach.
The first is care. If you have zero interest in this subject, DIY investing is not a realistic path. It's a non-starter.
The second is confidence. Confidence comes from educating yourself and being able to sort relevant information from irrelevant information. Without it, you won't sleep at night, which defeats the purpose.
The third is carving out the time. The good news here is that a simple, evidence-based investment approach doesn't require much ongoing time once it's set up. Checking in annually is usually sufficient. Checking in weekly or more often tends to lead to bad decisions.
If all three are present, DIY investing is within reach for most physicians. If one is missing, working with an advisor may be a better fit - and that's not a failure, it's just a different and equally valid path.
What Doesn't Make Physicians Happy
Dr. Poyner talks about what the research actually says drives life satisfaction. It has nothing to do with luxury cars or bigger houses. He calls it the four Fs: friends and family, fitness, philanthropy, and flow experiences. Flow experiences are hobbies or activities where you can lose yourself for hours at a time, whether that's sport, music, art, writing, or anything else that puts you fully in the moment.
The point of understanding this is that money is a tool that can create access to these things. Financial Independence, or even just progress toward it, gives you more control over your time. That's what allows people to spend more of it on what actually matters.
Red Flags When Evaluating a Financial Advisor
Dr. Poyner attended a webinar aimed at physicians that turned out to be a pitch from an advisor claiming to beat the market. He counted ten red flags in the presentation and wrote about them on his blog. A few worth knowing: any advisor whose primary value proposition is market timing or beating the market is not operating on an evidence-based approach. Fees in the two to four percent range without comprehensive financial planning attached are a red flag. And if meetings with your advisor are mostly about switching around investments rather than addressing your full financial picture, that's worth paying attention to.
The point isn't that all advisors are bad. It's that not all are created equal, and having enough baseline financial knowledge to ask the right questions when interviewing an advisor is genuinely valuable regardless of which path you choose.
Learn More
If you have any questions for Dr. Poyner, you can email him directly at: moneysmartmd@gmail.com
If you'd like to talk through how your corporation, investments, and overall plan fit together with a fee-based financial planner, book a free discovery call.